Note re photographs in this Blog: The most exciting pictures are courtesy of Canterbury Archaeological Trust – please see the last section of the Blog for more details. There are also some images of the Cathedral seen from the fields after dark, swathed in natural night time darkness and relatively unpolluted by artificial light.
Village Green Application: Public Inquiry Process about to begin
A key purpose of this 44th Chaucer Fields Picnic Society Blog is to act as a reminder that a key moment in the Village Green Application (VGA) – which, if successful, would protect the fields from despoilation for the forseeable future – is now imminent. As mentioned in November’s Blog, the Public Inquiry begins this coming Monday 23rd February, and will last for 5 days.If needed, a further week has been reserved for evidence gathering next month (week beginning 16th march).
This Kent County Council (KCC) Inquiry will be conducted in Canterbury’s newly refurbished Westgate Hall and begins at 10.00am. This is an excellent and resonant choice of venue – resonant, because, like the fields, this has in recent years been a much loved public space under threat of destruction. But as a result of an enormous community effort spearheaded energetically and with great skill by the Westgate Community Trust, that threat was challenged and successfully deflected. Let’s hope a similar fate awaits the fields. Here, there is also a great breadth of support, and those wanting “development” find themselves isolated and way out on a limb. After all, let’s recall the obvious and almost ubiquitous support throughout the local geographical community – to which Canterbury City Council has commendably responded by proposing ‘green gap’ status for the fields in the draft District Plan (see First CFPS Blog of 2014). But also let’s not forget the views articulated from within the university community itself: recall the decisive votes taken in favour of protecting the fields by both the staff union, the UCU, and the students’ union, Kent Union, earlier this decade.
While not everything depends upon a successful VGA, it would be an especially robust form of protection. So all who wish to see the natural beauty, breathtaking views, and wonderful health, leisure and social benefits associated with the existence of the unspoilt Southern Slopes safeguarded will want to follow the Public Inquiry process and its eventual outcome. It would be especially valuable if supporters who live locally and have the opportunity to attend the Inquiry express their commitment by coming along to some or all of the proceedings at Westgate Hall next week.
SCF Facebook and Fundraising Quiz Night 7th March
For more information and details on the Inquiry, please do follow the Save Chaucer Fields group’s Facebook page. You’ll also find there details of an important social event taking place between the two weeks of the Inquiry: there will be a Fundraising Quiz Night at the hall of St Dunstan’s church, Canterbury on Saturday 7th March from 7pm onwards. Again, please do come along to this too if you possibly can. These nights are always great fun, and allow supporters the chance to catch up socially, as well as hear the latest news about the campaign. But they also generate much needed financial resources for the SCF group, which relies on fundraising in order to cover legal costs and other expenses, which are high because of the complexity and depth of the Inquiry.
League Tables – mixed results for environmental issues: a time for reflection
The University of Kent is rightly proud of the impressive record in research and teaching of its its academic staff. A sense of the achievements, albeit somewhat mechanistically gauged, is communicated by its repeatedly strong showing in national “league tables”, and these results are reasonably used in efforts to persuade potential students, staff, funders and other stakeholders of the University’s significance. In recent years, such metrics have begun to be applied to other areas of higher educational life. The environmental dimension is an important one here. And although there is no equivalent to the routinised Government measures of performance in teaching and research, comparative yardsticks do seem to be beginning to come through.
Accordingly, the University has recently been keen to point to an evaluative exercise suggesting this is also an area where has also done well, referring in various media to how its ‘green credentials‘ have been underscored by a study by the University of Singapore. However, is the picture quite this straightforward? The answer is no. Unlike the case of research and teaching, where all the evidence tends to point in the same direction (towards remarkably high achievement) this is in fact not the case in relation to environmental policy and practice when these results are put in context. In particular, an apparently longer established and much more wide ranging exercise, conducted annually by the highly reputable and locally rooted environmental charity People & Planet, has consistently found the University of Kent stubbornly languishing with only a mediocre track record for some years- including the latest results released last month
People & Planet’s findings do not seem to have received a great deal of attention, at least in the public domain, from University authorities as yet. But it will be important to scrutinise both sets of results in the months ahead to ascertain why these results are so dramatically different. It likely partly reflects differences in methodology and focus, including the apparently wider evaluative horizons of the People & Planet studies. But are there other considerations? Presumably, both studies have strengths – but also weaknesses and flaws? Whatever the situation, it would surely be sensible to pause before rushing to celebratory conclusions. It would be healthy from the perspective of balanced communication, and working in the interests of transparency, for the University to engage with the results emerging from both exercises. so let us hope that the full range of evidence will be explicitly acknowledged and considered and debated in the months ahead.
Keynes III/Turing College – archaeological results
Finally, to add colour and interest to this Blog, with kind permission I have included images of late Bronze Age and Iron age artefacts found during Canterbury Archaelogical Trust’s excavations of the land just north of Chaucer Fields (above Beverley Farm and the western segment of University Road). That’s because I know many of you are keenly interested not only in the visible aesthetic and environmental and recreational value of our cherished local landscape, but also how the land connects with our heritage: the historical and pre-historical patterns that contribute to its sense of ‘specialness’. For substantive details, I would like to refer you to the excellent interim report prepared by Ross Lane Some of you heard Ross speak about the findings during the ‘open day’ on the site for the dig last summer, as reported in a CFPS Blog in summer 2013.
Ross, whose modesty veils a remarkable level of expertise especially on this period of our history, has kindly offered to talk at one of the Chaucer Fields Picnic Society events we will be holding this summer. I would be very grateful if you would let me know if you would be interested in hearing Ross share his knowledge in this area? Please email me at: firstname.lastname@example.org if you would like to attend an informal talk at one of our picnics, and I’ll have a better sense of the basis for proceeding.
That’s it for now. I hope to see you at Westgate Hall for the Inquiry and at St Dunstan’s church hall for the quiz!
Chaucer Fields Picnic Society