Photographic summertime 2014 Blog

Mistle Thrush

Resident Mistle thrush, late may 2014, later nested successfully,

chaucer fields ©Mark Kilner.


may-june 2014 batch incl picnic 212

“Cuckoo Spit” caused by froghopper nymphs, june 2014, Bushy Acres, chaucer fields


une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife 069

Blackbird, june 2014, Beverley Boughs, chaucer fields



July batch 056

Unidentified fruit, July 2014, Jack Cade’s carvet, chaucer fields


July batch 007

Oak foreground Cathedral background, June 2014, Bushy Acres, chaucer fields

une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife cropped butterfly

Speckled Wood, Pararge Aegeria [Linnaeus, 1758], June 2014, Bushy Acres, chaucer fields

une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife 086

Walkers, june 2014, Dover Down field, chaucer fields

une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife 026

Jay, June 2014, Beverley Boughs, chaucer fields


July batch 012

Honey bee, July 2014, Dover Down field, chaucer fields

une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife 074

Ancient path from Blean church to Cathedral, June 2014, Dover Down field,            chaucer fields

une 2014 batch incl CF wildlife 084

Meadow Brown, Maniola jurtina [Linnaeus, 1758], June 2014, Jack Cade’s carvet,    chaucer fields

July batch 030

An otherwise irritating sign put to good use by a house sparrow, July 2014, Dover Down field, chaucer fields



Whitethroat , late may 2014, thought to be in transit,

chaucer fields ©Mark Kilner


Next picnic date (21 Sept), District Plan deadline (30 Aug) & CAT Open Day

Dear all

I hope you are having  a good august. As you’ll have seen first hand, or may have picked up from the SCF Facebook site, the grass has now been cut, and the hay has been made!  So the fields are very much in late summer mode – for example, see image of Dover Down field below. This Blog will pick  up some of the threads of the last one, and is interspersed with some recent snaps from the fields:

august to september chaucer fields 004

Southern part of Dover Down field looking north, Chaucer Fields, late August 2013

Draft District Plan consultation deadline looms

A reminder:  The deadline for sending in your responses to Canterbury City Council (CCC) in relation to the proposed local plan, which has enormous implications for the character of our landscape and environment for years to come, is the end this month (5pm Friday 30 August). In an earlier Blog I included a link to the relevant website. However, it is clear that some people have found understanding and navigating the specific route for responding presented via this portal to be  opaque and excessively complicated.

school plus turing dig 076

Cathedral framed by Cade’s carvet hedge, southwards view from recently restored bench close to Innovation centre bus stop, august 2013

I was pleased to learn earlier this week that local community groups are sensibly suggesting that people  can respond in a much simpler and less time consuming way:  CCC should still take your feedback into account to the same extent as if you had followed the tortuous portal approach.

august to september chaucer fields 025

Unspoilt  Southern Slopes, between Bushy Acres and Eliot pathway, August 2013

What is this simpler approach? In what follows I have drawn upon and supplemented the guidance of one of the leading community groups the material relating most obviously to the situation regarding chaucer fields, the unspoilt southern slopes and the University. They rightly emphasise you shouldn’t feel the need  to make a detailed or complicated response: a simple snail mail  letter or e-mail will do. But it’s a good idea to say which particular enumerated and named policies you’re referring to, where this is possible:

  • ·         Write to or email CCC if you agree with the proposal that the University of Kent should be required to produce a Masterplan for its campus, which maintains its campus character, respects the setting of the site in the wider countryside, and includes a landscape strategy, write to say that you support policy EMP7.
  • ·        Write to or email CCC If you agree with the proposals to protect the environment, including views across the city from the University slopes, and protecting open spaces, write to say that you support policies HE2, LB2 and OS8
  •        Write to or email CCC if you welcome  the provisional decision not to consider the Southern Slopes as a potential site for housing development (200-300 houses) because this would dramatically violate Sustainability Objectives (Evidence base:  the  SHLAA-sites-Analysis conducted by AMEC for CCC in 2012)

 You can send your comments by post to Planning Policy Team, Planning and Regeneration, Canterbury City Council, Military Road, Canterbury, CT11YW; or by e-mailing

august to september chaucer fields 068

A juvenile jay foraging in apple tree dating back to Mount’s nursery days, southern part of Bushy Acres, august 2013

CAT Open Day, archaeological excavations

school plus turing dig 134

Ross from CAT discusses evidence of burial at the Keynes III/Turing excavation

I attended this fascinating event in the morning. Expert CAT staff were on hand to share their wealth of knowledge about how what is being found on the Keynes III/Turing college site adds to our understanding of how our ancestors were living 2-3 millenia ago. A highly informative guided tour of the site was provided.  Amongst the highlights for me on the day were:

  • learning that the place was a local centre for our ancestors throughout the entire iron age, although there was also modest evidence of settlement as early as the bronze age. It would have been a hive of activity  at the same time that Bigbury camp, just a few miles away near Harbledown (well known internationally as the place for a key military struggle between local people and the invading forces of emperor Claudius in 54 AD) was also famously flourishing
  • finding out that the site hosted differentiated areas for habitation (evidenced, for example, by pottery and charcoal from fire pits) and working life (including textiles: in particular numerous loom weights have been found). There is also ample evidence of burial and material relating to  funeral pyres, suggesting  that sacramental ceremonies would also have been performed here
  • confirming that the people who inhabited the site were involved in trade and transactions with others from outside the area, and even beyond England. Kent has long been proud of its role as a vanguard of civilisation in the British Isles from before the common era, a status documented by contemporary Roman writers. A beautiful horse-design coin originating from the North West of continental Europe, then part of the Roman empire (perhaps from what is now Belgium or France), probably about two thousand years old,has been unearthed  on the Keynes III/Turing site (see image).  Our iron age ancestors in this place were apparently systematically engaging in monetized commerce with our continental neighbours when other parts of the country were still relatively insular and isolated!
school plus turing dig 156

Pre-Roman invasion coin from continental Europe found at Keynes III/Turing excavation

Please see the CAT project site for more on this project in general. At the time of writing information on the success of  the open day has not yet been posted, but  hopefully an update will appear soon.

Next CFPS Picnic: Date confirmed

CF 27 aygust 017

Meadow Brown  basks in mid day sunshine, Bushy Acres, August 2013

I am delighted to announce that discussions on the timing of the collaborative picnic involving CFPS with local civil society groups has progressed, and we have now agreed a date: PM SATURDAY 21st September. Please put the date in your diaries now. I’ll report more detail on the plans in a future blog in terms of timing and content, but it’ll include all the usual CFPS activities (socialising, formal  games, informal play, musical  entertainment etc) and more besides.

Enjoy the rest  of your week!

Chaucer Fielder

Chaucer Fields Picnic Society

History Really Matters

balloons over canterbury

Source: courtesy of Max Apps, see bottom of Blog for further details

Crunch Times Approach

Since the last Blog, the recent fundraising musical event for the fields was a great success. I’ll come back to say more about that – and further plans for musical follow up collaborations between CFPS, SCF and others – in a Blog to follow. But for now, prompted by the discovery of the Christmas Post Card above, I wanted to take the opportunity afforded by this more relaxed time of year to look more deeply at fundamentals, and try to grasp some aspects of the ‘bigger picture’ of place and history that affect us. We need to be ready to think clearly about what we are doing from this longer term perspective as the discussion escalates.

Why do I say ‘escalates’? That’s because it is possible this could be the penultimate Christmas for Chaucer Fields as unspoilt shared green space, wiping out hundreds of years of historical continuity. You’ll recall from an earlier Blog (18 September, see archive) that the intention of those supporting the ‘development’ was that the process of replacing this unspoilt part of the Southern Slopes with concrete and tarmac would begin in the autumn of 2014. Even though the  planning application for this ‘development’ is still to materialise, this construction timetable is in theory still readily achievable, it seems to me, if  three conditions hold in the year ahead. First, if the planning application is granted by Canterbury City Council, or won on appeal. Second, if the Village Green Application to Kent County Council is not successful. (We now know that the public inquiry into this will take place week beginning 18 March 2013.) Third, if the promoters of the scheme inside the University succeed in their efforts to trivialise, deflect and disregard not only the mass of opposition to it in the city and beyond, but also what is the dominant oppositional view within the University itself.

jay 1

Jays like this have been very visible on Chaucer Fields and the Southern Slopes this winter. Image courtesy of the Woodland Trust/Kent Wildlife Trust

The fact that the fulfillment of each of these conditions is far from a foregone conclusion, and that development can only proceed if all of them are met, must give defenders of Chaucer Fields and the Southern Slopes some grounds for optimism. At least, its all to play for at this stage. What will decide the result? Most of the debates in 2013 have already been prefigured this year. They are to do with how people and institutions use and value the land; the feasibility and desirability of alternative sites and approaches;  the extent to which compelling environmental and economic arguments can be made against or in favour of situating the ‘development’ here; and the  willingness of those with authority and power to listen to and learn from people with knowledge of, and attachment to, the places they live and work.

The Need for a Long Term Historical Perspective

So far, so incontrovertible. These sorts of considerations would presumably be in play anywhere in England when a highly contested ‘development’, evidently out of line with local norms and policies, is proposed by an enormously powerful bureaucratic landowner  – whether they be in the public, private for-profit, or nonprofit sector (the University is legally in the last of these). However, I believe that understanding the issues in this way doesn’t really capture what is really at stake with this proposal. Why? Because no account is being taken of the historical dimension. Yet this is fundamental to the discussion. The ‘specialness’ and extent to which people and community’s cherish and value their surroundings is deeply bound up with their history. Indeed we need to start by recognising that in Canterbury, its surroundings and the District, history is especially important. Our area is characterised by a remarkably rich sense of cultural and environmental heritage. Those of us who live here feel privileged to share such a fascinating place, and are proud to bear witness to its combination of natural and man made beauty with visiting relatives, friends or work associates.

Beverley farmhouse viewed from its setting in Chaucer Fields

Beverley farmhouse viewed from the East from within Chaucer Fields, summer 2012

But why is heritage so relevant in this specific  case? Well, the more I have looked into this, the more I have understood that the unspoilt  ‘Chaucer Fields’ and the Southern Slopes really have a central part to play in that wonderful historical legacy of ours. When the Blog started 9 months ago, drawing on the archival research into texts and maps conducted by the Canterbury Archaeological Trust. I stressed the ancient origins of this inheritance: How Beverley Farm, closely tied to the Slopes and Fields for hundreds of years, had originally been built in the late fifteenth century. I reflected on how those who built  the core of this farmhouse, still in place today, would have had the chance to pause on the slopes, gaze south, and witness the erection of the Cathedral’s Bell Harry Tower in 1498. I tried to draw attention to the beauty of the mediaeval field structure, and the 300 year old precursors of the numerous paths that circumvent and criss cross the land to this day.

I also stressed how amongst those associated with this place were some of of the key figures of the city’s history, such as the Roper family. And I noted the way in which, while some features are recognisably hundreds of years old, others gently reflect the more recent imprint of modern man’s activities, involving remnants of mixed agriculture, orchards, market gardening and latterly park land planting. No evidence of hop gardens, unfortunately! But other than that, how could it be more classically Kentish in character?

Beverley farm 1899

Beverley farm viewed from the west in 1899. Source: Reproduced with permission from Paul Crampton’s Canterbury: Suburbs & Surroundings, History Press, 2010, p. 24

Canterbury Under Threat

But I now know that there is even more to it than this. And this is where the Post Card image at the top of the Blog comes in. 70 years ago, Canterbury people chose to gather on Chaucer Fields and the Southern Slopes at an existential moment in our history. This was 1942, long before Chaucer College (from which the current term ‘Chaucer Fields’ probably originates), the University road, or indeed the University existed.Then, they would have simply talked of meeting in Beverley farm’s fields – perhaps having made their way up Beverley road, or having paused for refreshment in Ye Olde Beverlie public house, further down the Slopes.Why chose to meet there? They were heading up the Slopes to safely get a panoramic perspective of their city and its surroundings as it was bombed, and suffered great damage, in the midst of World War Two, as local writer Janet Cameron has discussed (see her short Suite 101 2010 article from 2010 on Canterbury and the Blitz).

A year after the worst of the bombing was over, this was evidently still a favourite spot from which everyone could freely share views of the city and its surroundings. The city was now protected by barrage balloons, and the place had apparently become so well known as a place for appreciating the city and the nature surrounding it that a special Christmas post card was even created to capture the iconic view: hence the image with which this Blog  began.

Normal  University and Canterbury relations: Shared Fields agenda 1965 – 2008

You might think that the arrival of the University some 22 years later was the moment at which the status of these fields as iconic viewpoint and safe haven would be threatened. Not so. For most of the rest of the twentieth century, the establishment of the University on the hill was not seen as precluding the conservation of this special place at all. Indeed, the presumption that it was worthy of protection was actively build into policies and practices from the very beginning. The land here had been made available by statutory authorities to the University on extremely generous terms (see Graham Martin’s  From Vision to Reality: the Making of the University of Kent, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1990). But there were conditions. One was that it remained, in essence, open space, ensuring that those views and and the wonderful landscape would continue to be available for the people of Canterbury and of the new University alike.

Some ‘development’ was to take place at the margins of this part of campus space in the ensuing 4 decades. The foundation of Chaucer College in 1990 clearly involved bricks and mortar. But the overall spirit of the beautiful landscape as experienced south of University road remained gloriously in evidence, and was explicitly undergirded by planning decisions and policies. Canterbury City Council records from 1990 show that the Planning Committee permitted Chaucer College to be built at all only because its low level, elegant buildings could be concealed due to the natural shape of the land. Such a development was possible  and only in this particular topographical conjuncture. Uniquely on this particular plot of land, low level buildings could be erected without violating the ‘spirit’ of the wonderful Southern Slopes landscape at any time of year. Moreover, the importance of the Southern Slopes landscape south of University Road was to go on to be actively reinforced in planning policy. Landscape value provisions to this effect were to be found in the District Plans developed over the next two decades, and still to be found there in the current plan.

So, we need to remember that for most of the time since it was founded, the University was duly recognising and respecting the importance of the unspoilt landscape here: its preservation was seen as an important obligation which had to be honoured. Of symbolic importance at the time, a bench was situated by an earlier generation of University leaders at a particularly well chosen point overlooking the fields. It was located  just south of University road, below Beverley Farm. And reflecting the Council’s recognition of the well chosen nature of this decision,  the importance of this particular spot for unspoilt viewing of Canterbury’s magical mixture of historic buildings and natural beauty was to  be explicitly affirmed as a Canterbury City Council conservation priority:  the preciousness of the view from here was highlighted as capturing one of the very best vistas freely available to all in the whole District (see below)

Viewpoint Conservation Policy

Source: Canterbury Conservation Area Appraisal, Adopted 12 October 2010, p. 33

The University: The current ‘development’ proposals (2009 – ) as Anomaly

Thus, policies and practices embodied a long established and reciprocal tradition of respect for, and commitment to this place, as unspoilt, shared  open green land until very recently. The unexpected, shocking, unilateral abandonment of this commitment by elements in the University in the very recent past, with the launch of the ‘development’ proposals, must demonstrably be seen as an aberration from this historical perspective.

But I hope that you will agree with me that this situation is entirely reversible. As awareness of the longer, positive  legacy of co-operation grows, we must  hope that 2013 will be the year in which respect for our heritage is reasserted. The University’s 50th birthday is approaching. So it is time to think about this issue in a historically sensitive and responsible way once again. A voluntarily initiative by  the University, through a withdrawal  of the Chaucer Conferencer Centre proposals next year, and an intelligent rethink of its development options, is the way to go. This is needed to ensure that the University is working with, rather than against, both the local community that hosts it, and the overwhelming majority of its own people.

balloons over canterbury  text.only JPG

Text  of  the late Terry Hougham accompanying the Post Card at the top of this Blog. It was published in his 1992 collection Canterbury in Old Picture Postcards, European Library-Zaltbommel/Netherlands. I am a grateful to Max Apps, Terry’s grandson, for permission to reproduce this here

Best wishes and Happy Christmas,

Chaucer Fielder

Chaucer Fields Picnic Society


Village Green Application – news from today’s meeting (11th september)

Dear all

I am pleased to be able to let you know that today Kent County Council (KCC) decided to launch a non-statutory public inquiry in response to the evidence assembled for the ‘Chaucer Fields’ (better, ‘Southern Slopes’) Village Green application. There was a site visit this morning. Then, in front of a packed audience at Westgate Hall (I counted well over 80 people), a senior KCC officer presented with great skill and clarity her report to a panel of elected members (that is, KCC Councillors). In this report (see KCC report VGA application sept 2012) it was argued cogently that it was neither possible to dismiss nor accept the  Village Green Application based upon available evidence. This was because there were key issues upon which the evidence of the applicants, and that of the University (as sole objector), were out of line. For example, the University asserted there was little use of the land for recreation, whereas the applicants argued that there was indeed extensive use of the land for precisely these purposes.

Jays are amongst the colourful birds witnessed by users of  the Southern Slopes.                     Images  in this  Blog courtesy of the Woodland Trust/Kent Wildlife Trust

In these circumstances (in which the basic facts of the application are contentious) a public enquiry to look in more depth at the evidence was recommended by the officer. All panel members, the applicants – and even the University’s legal counsel (who had little choice)  – welcomed the report. KCC members then voted to endorse the recommendation.

This is good news for the community  – and the large numbers of University people, and civil society organisations, who share the unspoilt space agenda –  for two reasons. First, simply because it creates further time and opportunity to argue our compelling case for retaining the fields as beautiful, high value green space, whatever the ultimate outcome of the VGA. Due to the backlog of cases KCC is processing, the inquiry is unlikely to be even launched before spring 2013, and would be expected to take several weeks or months. So that the final VGA decision is unlikely to come before late 2013, perhaps not for a year.

Green woodpecker or ‘yaffle’ – Often heard or seen on the Southern Slopes
Images in this Blog courtesy of Woodland Trust/Kent Wildlife Trust

Second, it is also good news because there is a reasonable chance that the outcome the community wants may eventually emerge: that is, that the inquiry could find in the applicant’s favour when it does report in late 2013; and if confirmed, 43 acres of the Southern  Slopes would then be legally protected as common land. The dismissive attitude towards the VGA  from the promoters of the  ‘development’  of Chaucer Fields within the University, so evident earlier this year, has now been publicly shown to be premature. All can now see there is a large body of evidence in support of the pro-Village Green case. Although the legal tests which must all be met are really very demanding, the case is demonstrably strong, and the community and its pro-green space allies in the University and civil society may succeed!

The singing of wrens is  familiar across the Southern Slopes
Images in Blog courtesy of Woodland Trust/Kent Wildlife Trust

That’s the good news from today, hopefully to balance against yesterday’s gloom when some depressing information about the University’s latest ‘development’ intentions began to emerge. More to follow in due course!

Best wishes

Chaucer Fielder

Chaucer Fields  Picnic Society